Something personal

Large bold white text "SOMETHING" above outlined black-and-white bold text "PERSONAL" centred over a blurred close-up of blue asphalt with two pale yellow diagonal lane lines.

Waltham Forest Council issued my wife a PCN for entering a School Streets zone. She had a valid permit, and their own system confirmation said so.

I submitted formal representations to the published email address within the statutory window and attached the valid permit. I didn’t get an acknowledgement, so I chased, but still nothing. Last weekend we got a Charge Certificate and a penalty of £240 on the basis that “No representations made.” They did not process the email but escalated the Charge Notice anyway.

But here is the point. Most people would have paid the £240, not because they were wrong, but because the process is exhausting. After the last call with the Council on Monday, my wife even said just pay it – even though the Penalty Charge is invalid.

No auto-acknowledgement of representations and no audit trail for residents. Escalation that treats silence as non-response, even when the silence is theirs. This is contractor accountability failure.

A third party – NSL – runs the system. Waltham Forest Council owns the outcome. When emails vanish and “no record” becomes their defence, residents lose, even when they’re right.

Outsourcing transfers cost and transfers risk, but it does not transfer accountability. When it goes wrong, the organisation owns the outcome whether or not it owns the process. Many organisations have not reconciled those two things.


Please comment...

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.