Better
Brevity isn’t always better. New isn’t always better. Disruptive isn’t always better. Innovation isn’t always better. Better IS always better; it just might not be evenly distributed.
Brevity isn’t always better. New isn’t always better. Disruptive isn’t always better. Innovation isn’t always better. Better IS always better; it just might not be evenly distributed.
Often you are limited to getting your career history and relevance for a job onto 2 sides of A4. Knowing what to leave out can be tough and it’s easy to go onto 3 or 4 sides. Easier to do if you make the text size 8.
Please stop sending me requests describing your new disruptive innovation with these 4 statements: We’ve got this technology you’ll be interested in. We’ve got these members who you might know. We talk about this stuff that we know you know. We’re different to every other community you’re a member of. I usually ask the following… Read More Join our community
John Manzoni, the Civil Service Chief Executive, said the Civil Service was doing 30% too much to do it well. Does the same apply to learning? Over-engineered solutions and over complicated scenarios and experiences, with poor links to workplace activity, may look great but do they work? If you could strip 30% from your learning… Read More 30%
In the #LDInsight chat the other week I mentioned this: It feels like we’re trying to avoid unintended consequences by replicating what we do in the office and that won’t happen – different context produces different outcomes. If you’ve been building a twin of your face to face processes, don’t be surprised when things don’t… Read More Twins, non-identical