Value of learning

Equation showing 1+1=3
Photo by George Becker on Pexels.com

I mentioned measurement and evaluation from the Barcelona Principles posts last time. The next amended principle I drafted is about value and cost.

The principle I suggested is:

Learning cost figures are not the value of learning

I’ve always had a feeling that people in learning have considered that something purchased is better than something free. I’ve done it myself – the act of going through a procurement process creates a need for the ‘thing’ to ‘work’. We do this to both justify expense and to refrain from using nil/neutral cost alternatives.

Since cash is invested in something, we tend to want to ‘prove’ it’s worked. What this means in learning terms is an over-reliance in the learning costs, in the same way there is an over-reliance on the other learning data – site visits, people in the room, etc.

An input on it’s own can never provide a value judgement. For that to happen, both outputs and outcomes are required to complete the equation.

By all means, include the learning cost figures but make sure that your co-efficients and data are reflecting the real world and not just the perceived value that learning attaches to the expensive investment.

Please comment...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.